Defined Benefit
Defined Contribution
Insurance Assets
Nonprofit

A JOLT of Inflation from the Labor Market?

A JOLT of Inflation from the Labor Market?
clock
4 min 18 sec

Recent economic reports have prompted fears that prices in the U.S. are about to take off. Concerns that pandemic-related supply bottlenecks, combined with increased consumer demand due to unprecedented fiscal and monetary stimulus, would lead to an undesirable jump in inflation seem to be, at least preliminarily, materializing. While increasing costs have been widespread, the greatest opportunity for sustained price increases lies in the labor market and the possibility of a wage-price spiral.

The August Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS), which the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) conducts as a complement to the unemployment report, highlighted these inflation fears. The report showed that total nonfarm job openings are at their highest level since the survey was started in 2000. This is true even though hiring has returned to pre-pandemic levels, indicating employers are finding labor in short supply. Workers seem to recognize their current value as “quits” are also near an all-time high, demonstrating they are confident they can improve their positions, including their compensation, by moving to new employers. Taken together, these statistics could signal a trend of increasing compensation driving more widespread inflation.

While the data in the survey are startling, underlying trends are more comforting. First, hiring is highly industry-dependent. The two industries that suffered the most from the pandemic lockdowns, Leisure and Hospitality and Accommodation and Food Services, are the greatest beneficiaries of the hiring recovery. Conversely, Manufacturing and Construction, which weathered restrictions relatively well, have seen hiring flatline since the middle of last year.

Second, while unemployment has fallen dramatically from its peak, it is still well above its pre-pandemic levels. The jobless rate was down to 3.5% in February 2020 before it rose to 14.8% two months later. In July it fell to 5.4%, but this is still nearly two percentage points higher than prior to the lockdowns.

Not only are there high numbers of unemployed workers, but there is also turnover within the group that is employed. Initial claims for unemployment have subsided since they peaked at over 6 million in April 2020. While they have fallen substantially since then, they have been hovering around 400,000 for weeks. The last time they were this high was early in 2012 when the economy was still recovering from the impact of the Global Financial Crisis. For most of the last five years they have bounced between 200,000 and 250,000. The elevated levels of both unemployment and employment turnover suggest that there is still a significant amount of labor on the sidelines.

A key question is what might be keeping people from going back to work. Some economists argue that expanded unemployment benefits have discouraged workers from returning. So far the evidence has been mostly anecdotal, but as more states stop offering these benefits, data to support or refute this argument will become available.

The hiring gap may also reflect how quickly unemployed workers are ready to reenter the workforce. Those not responding to openings now may more readily join the workforce later. The reasons often cited include concern about exposure to the virus at work and the need to care for children given the limited availability of child care and school.

Evidence of this is limited, but some information can be inferred from recent statistics. One metric is the number of workers who are “marginally attached” to the labor force but not “discouraged” workers. Marginally attached workers “includes those who did not actively look for work in the prior four weeks for such reasons as school or family responsibilities, ill health, and transportation problems,” according to the BLS. Although people who fall in this group may be members for reasons other than family responsibilities, these statistics are still likely to be representative of those with family responsibilities that interfere with their ability to work. Not surprisingly the numbers peaked in April 2020 during the depths of the pandemic. They subsequently started falling as reopenings began in the summer of 2020, and they are not historically high. Higher levels were experienced continuously from 2011 into 2015. As the economy returns to normal (including expanding child care options), the number of marginally attached workers is likely to decline more, thus expanding the labor force and limiting the pressure on wages.

Finally, perhaps the best indicator of an imbalance between the supply and demand of labor is the rate at which compensation is rising. Average compensation rose substantially at the beginning of the pandemic as many low-wage workers performed jobs affected by pandemic lockdowns. The average then dropped as lower wage workers returned. Since 3Q20, earnings have increased at a rate that is only modestly above the trend that preceded the pandemic.

The employment situation remains uncertain as the economy as a whole moves toward normalization. Fears of a labor shortage resulting in substantial increases in compensation that in turn fuel high levels of inflation may ultimately be realized. While there are early signs that this is occurring, this result is far from assured, and more data will be needed to draw firmer conclusions.

Posted by

Share
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Related Posts
Macro Trends

Strong U.S. Economy Refuses to Cooperate

Jay Kloepfer
Jay Kloepfer analyzes the U.S. economy in 3Q24 and the outlook ahead.
Macro Trends

Election Tension but No Sign of That in the Markets

Kyle Fekete
Callan expert explains the major trends shaping the global economy as the U.S. election approaches.
Macro Trends

Can the Fed Stick the Landing?

Jay Kloepfer
Callan expert analyzes the 2Q24 global economy and Federal Reserve policy.
Macro Trends

Politics Upstage Economic News

Kristin Bradbury
Callan expert analyzes global economic issues in 2Q24 and the implications of political upheaval.
Macro Trends

Investors, Be Careful for What You Wish

Jay Kloepfer
Callan expert analyzes the 1Q24 global economy and Federal Reserve policy.
Macro Trends

Are We Headed for an Economic ‘Rapid Unplanned Disassembly’?

Alex Browning
Callan analyst examines the state of the U.S. economy and the prospects for a soft landing.
Macro Trends

Higher for Longer? Rates and the Global Economy

Kristin Bradbury
Callan expert analyzes the global economy in 1Q24.
Macro Trends

The U.S. Economy Is More Surprising by the Quarter

Jay Kloepfer
Jay Kloepfer analyzes the U.S. and global economies in 4Q23 and for the full year.
Macro Trends

Grim Economic Forecasts Successfully Thwarted

Kristin Bradbury
Kristin Bradbury provides an assessment of the global economy in 4Q23.
Macro Trends

Stunning Growth in U.S. Economy as Clouds Loom

Jay Kloepfer
This blog post analyzes the economy in 3Q23.

Callan Family Office

You are now leaving Callan LLC’s website and going to Callan Family Office’s website. Callan Family Office is not affiliated with Callan LLC.  Callan LLC has licensed the Callan® trademark to Callan Family Office for use in providing investment advisory services to ultra-high net worth clients, family foundations, and endowments. Callan Family Office and Callan LLC are independent, unaffiliated investment advisory firms separately registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

Callan LLC is not responsible for the services and content on Callan Family Office’s website. Inclusion of this link does not constitute or imply an endorsement, sponsorship, or recommendation by Callan LLC of their website, or its contents, and Callan LLC is not responsible or liable for your use of it. When visiting their website, you are subject to Callan Family Office’s terms of use and privacy policies.